Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Üstün Zekâlı Olan ve Olmayan Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Yaşam Doyumu, Kişilik ve Sosyal Adaptasyon

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 98 - 113, 28.03.2025

Fatıma Firdevs Adam , Adnan Özbey , Seyit Karaburçak

https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1466418

Öz

Farklı potansiyellerle dünyaya gelen üstün zekalılar, kendilerine uygun koşullar sağlandığında var olan potansiyellerini daha verimli kullanacakları bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üstün zekâlı ve normal gelişim gösteren üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özelliklerini, yaşam doyumlarını ve sosyal adaptasyon uyum düzeylerini karşılaştırmaktır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan Korelasyonel Tarama Modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya farklı üniversitelerden farklı sınıflarda toplam 90 üstün zekalı ve 86 normal gelişim gösteren öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre üstün zekalı öğrencilerin açıklık ve dürüstlük düzeyleri normal gelişim gösterenlere göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulunmuştur. Üstün zekalı kadınların uyumluluk düzeyleri üstün zekalı erkeklere göre, normal gelişim gösteren erkeklerin uyumluluk düzeyleri normal gelişim gösteren kadınlara göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Normal gelişim gösteren erkeklerin sorumluluk düzeyi, normal gelişim gösteren kadınlara göre anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonuçları değerlendirildiğinde, üstün zekalı üniversite öğrencilerinin daha meraklı, sanata duyarlı, estetiğe önem veren, öz disiplini yüksek, görevlerini yapma bilincinin yüksek olduğu ve daha çok kararlılık göstermeyi tercih ettikleri söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri üstün/özel yetenek sosyal adaptasyon yaşam memnuniyeti

Kaynakça

  • Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Journal of Individual Differences, 27(3), 117-126.
  • Arabska, E. (2015). Problems of Employment and Unemployment in Bulgaria: Is Sustainable Development Possible? Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 1(1), 47-99.
  • Arabska, E. (2016). Active social policies-insights in developing a functioning labor market. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences BNEJSS, 3, 47-63.
  • Aydın, Y. E., Çok, R., Dengiz, G. , & Tunç, E. (2022). Investigation of Peer Relationships of Gifted and Non-Gifted High School Students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 30(1), 236-250. doi: 10.24106/kefdergi. 685221.
  • Baş, U. A., & Yurdabakan, D. (2017). Psikolojik sağlamlık ve okul ikliminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumunu yordama gücü. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(41) , 202-214.
  • Basım, H. N., Çetin, F., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63).
  • Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729.
  • Berezin, F. (1988). Phychological and psychophysiological adaptation of the human.
  • Bergold, S., Wirthwein, L., Rost, D.H. & Steinmayr, R. (2015) Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers? Front. Psychol. 6:1623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01623.
  • Buch, S. R., Sparfeldt, J. R. & Rost, D. H. (2006). Parents evaluate the developement of their highly gifted children. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049- 8637.38.2.53
  • Buss, D.M.(1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In J.S. Wiggins (Ed.).The five-factor model of personality: theoretical perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. PegemA.
  • Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1992). Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time periods. Social Indicators Research, 26, 101-117.
  • Coleman, L. & Cross, T. (2001). Being Gifted in School: an Introduction to Development Guidance and Teaching, Prufrock Press, WACO, TX, s. 146-167.
  • Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653-665.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Trait theories of personality. In Advanced personality (pp. 103-121). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Social dominance, moral politics, and gifted education. Roeper Review, 28(1), 21-29.
  • Cross, J. R., Cross, T. L., & Finch, H. (2010). Maximizing student potential versus building community: An exploration of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and preferred practice among supporters of gifted education. Roeper Review, 32(4), 235-248.
  • Cross, T. L. (2003). Leaving no gifted child behind: Breaking our educational system of privilege. Roeper Review, 25, 101-102.
  • Cross, T. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F. A. & Adams, C. M. (2008). The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321810
  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective wellbeing. InD. Kahneman, E.Diener,&N. Schwarz (Eds.),Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213 229). New York: Russell Sage.
  • Dimitrijevic, A. A. (2012). A faceted eye on intellectual giftedness: Examining the personality of gifted students using FFM domains and facets. Psihologija, 45(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1203231A
  • Dost, M, T, (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumunun bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (22), 132-143.
  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245-277.
  • Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449–464.
  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism? European journal of Personality, 18(6), 463-482.
  • Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21-51). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • Ercan, H. (2019). Ergenlerde yaşam doyumunun demografik değişkenler, ebeveyn tutumları ve kişilik özellikleri açısından incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (2), 501-516.
  • Feger, B. (1988). Die Beratungsstelle für Hochbegabtenprobleme in Hamburg. Besondere Begabungen in der normalen Schule-Forschung, Beratung, pädagogischer Auftrag, 109-123
  • Fonseca, C. (2021). Emotional intensity in gifted students: Helping kids cope with explosive feelings. Routledge.
  • Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24(2), 52-58.
  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158-164.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (2013). An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. personality and personality disorders: The Science of Mental Health, 7, 34.
  • Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Ottone-Cross, K., McCoach, D. B., Langley, S. D., Callahan, C. M., ... & Caughey, M. (2021). Identifying and serving gifted and talented students: Are identification and services connected?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 115-131.
  • Hallahan, D. P., & Kaufmann, J. M. (1991). Exceptional children: ıntroduction to special education. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  • Hampson, D. (2006). Personality traits in gifted children from promotion programs. University of Zurich.
  • Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1, 8-13.
  • Hollaender, A., & Hebborn-Brass, U. (1989). Beziehungen zwischen ıntelligenz und pathogenese unterschiedlicher psychischer störungen im kindesalter. Zeitschrift für Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie, 17(2), 63-69.
  • Jenaabadi, H., Marziyeh, A., & Dadkan, A. M. (2015). Comparing Emotional Creativity and Social Adjustment of Gifted and Normal Students. Advances in Applied Sociology, 5, 111-118.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. The Free Press.
  • Jensen, A.R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 193-219.
  • Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership. A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 542-552.
  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
  • Juriševiča, M., Žeraka, U. (2019). Attitudes Towards Gifed Students and Teir Education in the Slovenian Context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art Volume 12, Issue 4.
  • Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & Van Soest, A. (2010). Life satisfaction. International differences in well-being, 70-104.
  • Karaman, N. G., Dogan, T., & Coban, A. E. (2010). A study to adapt the big five inventory to Turkish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2357-2359.
  • Katanani, H.J.K. (2020). Life satisfaction for gifted adults: Its relation to gender, age, religiosity, and income. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1631-1644. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.840243.
  • Koçak, R. & İçmenoğlu, E. (2012). Emotional intelligence and creativity as predictors of life satisfaction among gifted students. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(37), 73-85.
  • Kornadt, H.J. (1988). Hochbegabte in der nonnalen Schule Förderung nötig oder überflüssig (Gifted children in the nonnal school Special training, necessary or superfluous?). In H. Bartenwerfer (Ed.), Besonden! Begabungen in der normalen Schule Forschung, Berutung, pädagogischer Auftrug (pp. 131). Gesellschaft zur Förderung Pädagogischer Forschu ng GFPF.
  • Kyalo PM & Chumba RJ. (2011). Selected Factors Influencing Social and Academic Adjustment of Undergraduate Students of Egerton University; Njoro Campus. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2(18): 274-90.
  • Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer, & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Lehman, E. B., & Erdwins, C. J. (2004). The social and emotional adjustment of young. Intellectually Gifted Children.
  • Levin, S. L. (1996). A social psychological approach to understanding intergroup attitudes in the United States and Israel. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology,UCLA.
  • Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorób, J., Bedyńska, S., Śliwińska, K., & Jastrzebska, D. (2014). “Old wine in new bottles”? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the Big Five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.003
  • López, V., & Sotillo, M. (2009). Giftedness and social adjustment: Evidence supporting the resilience approach in Spanish‐speaking children and adolescents. High Ability Studies, 20(1), 39-53.
  • Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychol. Sci. 17, 194–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01685.x
  • Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217-2232.
  • Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75-79.
  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527-539.
  • Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620-637.
  • Luhmann, M., & Eid, M. (2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 363- 381.
  • Luhmann, M., Schimmack, U., & Eid, M. (2011). Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 186- 197.
  • Mammadov, S., Cross, T.L., Ward, T.J. (2018). The big five personality predictors of academic achievement in gifted students: mediation by self-regulatory efficacy and academic motivation. High Ability Studies. DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2018.1489222
  • Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37, 29-56.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.
  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1456–1468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456
  • Nam, A. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam doyumu: beş faktör kişilik özellikleri, bilinçli farkındalık ve yılmazlığın rolü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi . Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Mersin.
  • Nicol, A. A., & De France, K. (2016). The Big Five's relation with the facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and individual differences, 98, 320-323.
  • Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40 year follow up of the Terman gifted group (Vol. 77). Stanford University Press.
  • Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: a case for developing america's talent. Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Oğurlu, Ü. (2010). Üstün zekâlı ve yeteneklilerde sosyal uyum ve arkadaşlık ilişkileri: literatür taraması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:03 No:39 Sf: 90-99
  • Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2001). Pleasures and subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 15, 153-167.
  • Oishi, S.,Diener, E., Suh, E.,&Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as amoderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157-184.
  • Öğretici, A. E. (2017). Bir grup üstün zekalı çocuğun sosyal uyum durumlarının incelenmesi (Master's thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18(11), 948-952.
  • Peperkorn, C., Wegner, C. (2020). The big-five-personality and academic self-concept in gifted and non-gifted students: a systematic review of literature. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 649-667.
  • Peperkorn, C., Wegner, C. (2021). Examining personality differences between scientifically gifted and nongifted students: indications for gifted education and teacher trainings. International Journal Of Research İn Education And Science (IJRES). 7(4), 1245- 1262. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2420
  • Perry, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Big-Five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 3-8.
  • Persson, R.S. (2020). Extreme ıntellectual ability and the dynamics of social ınclusion. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity – 8(1).
  • Petrova, S. (2020). Social-psychological adaptation of academic gifted adolescents with various degrees of Internet addiction. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 94.
  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The propensity interpretation of probability. The British Journal For The Philosophy Of Science, 10(37), 25-42.
  • Pratto, F., & Choudhury, P. (1998). A group status analysis of in-group identification and support for group inequality: Ethnicity, sex, and sexual orientation. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Connecticut.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
  • Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., & Port, G. (2017). Life satisfaction. Encyclopedia of adolescence, 2(1), s2165-2176.
  • Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
  • Punch, M. (2009). Police corruption: Deviance, accountability and reform in policing. Routledge.
  • Renzulli, J.S. & Delcount, M.A.B. (1986). ‘The legacy and logic of resarch on identification of gifted gifted persons’. Gifted Child Quatery, 30, 20-23.
  • Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
  • Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523-1544.
  • Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31-35.
  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25.
  • Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Caspi, A. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 375-398). New York: Guilford.
  • Rost, D. H., & Czeschlik, T. (1994). The psycho-social adjustment of gifted children in middle-childhood. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(1), 15-25.
  • Sam DL. (2001). Satisfaction with Life among International Students: An Exploratory Study. Social Indicators Research. 53(3): 315-37.
  • Sayler, M. F., Brookshire, W. K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 150–154.
  • Schimmack, U., Bockenholt, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002). Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 461-483.
  • Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345-385.
  • Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062-1075.
  • Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P.,Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1313-1329.
  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. ve Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of big fi ve personality traits: Patterns and profi les of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (2), 173-212.
  • Shaunessy, E., Suldo, S. M., Hardesty, R. B., Shaffer, E. J. (2006). School functioning and psychological well-being of international baccalaureate and general education students. A preliminary examination. J. Second. Gift. Educ. 17, 76–89
  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010a). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Political Psychology, 31, 109–137.
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F, Martin, M., & Stallworth, L. M. (1991). Consensual racism and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory. Political Psychology, 12, 691-720.
  • Silverman, L K. (1983). Issues in affective development of the giftcd. In J. van ThsselBarka (Ed.), A practical guide to counseling the gifted in a school setting (pp. 621). Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped, & Gifted Children.
  • Smith, C. L., Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Gaertner, B. M., Popp, T. K., & Maxon, E. (2007). Maternal personality: Longitudinal associations to parenting behavior and maternal emotional expressions toward toddlers. Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 305-329.
  • Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330-348.
  • Specht, J., Egloff, B., Schmukle, S. C. (2013). Examining mechanisms of personality maturation: The impact of life satisfaction on the development of Big Five personality traits, SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, No. 455, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin
  • Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862-882.
  • Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows up: Twenty-five years' follow-up of a superior group.
  • Terziev, V. (2014). Opportunities to increase effectivensss of social adaptation of servicemen discharged of military services.
  • Ulu, I. P., & Tezer, E. (2010). Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism, adult attachment, and big five personality traits. The Journal of Psychology, 144(4), 327-340.
  • Van Aken, M. A., Denissen, J. J., Branje, S. J., Dubas, J. S., & Goossens, L. (2006). Midlife concerns and short‐term personality change in middle adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 20(6), 497-513.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). The study of life-satisfaction.
  • Wirthwein, L., Bergold, S., Preckel, F., & Steinmayr, R. (2019). Personality and school functioning of intellectually gifted and nongifted adolescents: Self-perceptions and parents’ assessments. Learning And Individual Differences, 73, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.003
  • Wirthwein, L.,& Rost, D. H. (2011). Giftedness and subjective wellbeing: a study with adults. Learn. Individual Diff. 21, 182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.001
  • Yusoff YM. (2012). Self-Efficacy, Perceived Social Support, and Psychological Adjustment in International Undergraduate Students in a Public Higher Education Institution in Malaysia. Journal of Studies in International Education. 16(4): 353-71.
  • Zeidner, M., Shani-Zinovich, I. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007.
  • Gündoğdu, K., & Ozan, C. (2013). Bilgisayar destekli öğretim. B. Oral (Ed.), Öğrenme öğretme kuram ve yaklaşımları içinde (2. baskı, ss. 385-410). Pegem Akademi.
Toplam 121 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık (Diğer), Özel Yetenekli Eğitimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Fatıma Firdevs Adam 0000-0003-1765-6287

Adnan Özbey 0000-0002-5198-8026

Seyit Karaburçak 0000-0002-8279-6748

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Nisan 2024
Kabul Tarihi 2 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Adam, F. F., Özbey, A., & Karaburçak, S. (2025). Üstün Zekâlı Olan ve Olmayan Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Yaşam Doyumu, Kişilik ve Sosyal Adaptasyon. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 14(1), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1466418
 Kapak Resmi İndir

e-ISSN: 2147-1606

14550        14551