From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment

Halil Sarı

doi:10.30703/cije.1747628

TR EN

Kaygıdan Başarıya: Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme Uygulamaları Yoluyla Yazma Kaygısının Ele Alınması

Öz

Bu çalışma, biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamalarının öğrencilerin yazma kaygısı üzerindeki etkilerine dair literatürü, özellikle Yabancı Dil olarak İngilizce (EFL) bağlamında bir araya getirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Yazma kaygısı; öğrencilerin yazma performansını, motivasyonunu ve akademik katılımını olumsuz etkileyen çok yönlü bir olgudur. Bu inceleme; ampirik araştırma ve teorik tartışmalardan elde edilen kanıtları sentezleyerek, zamanında geri bildirim, akran değerlendirmesi, öz-değerlendirme ve üstbilişsel yansıtma gibi biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamalarının kaygıyı hafifletme ve yazma öz-yeterliliği inşa etmedeki etkililiğini vurgulamıştır. İncelemeye dahil edilen çalışmalar; çeşitli veri tabanları üzerinden 'biçimlendirici değerlendirme', 'yazma kaygısı' ve 'EFL öğrencileri' gibi anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak yapılan aramalarla, son yirmi yılda yayımlanmış hakemli dergi makaleleri arasından seçilmiştir. Seçim kriterleri, deneysel geçerlilik, metodolojik netlik ve incelemenin amaçlarıyla tematik uyum üzerine odaklanmıştır. Bu tür uygulamaların (eğitime) entegre edilmesi, öğrencilerin yazmayı bir performans görevi olarak değil, gelişimsel ve destekleyici bir süreç olarak algılamalarını sağlar. Çalışma, biçimlendirici değerlendirmenin yalnızca öğrencilerin duygusal durumunu iyileştirmekle kalmayıp, aynı zamanda birer yazar olarak akademik gelişimlerinde ve özerkliklerinde belirleyici bir rol oynadığını göstermiştir. Bu nedenle mevcut çalışma, yazma öğretiminde biçimlendirici değerlendirmenin entegrasyonunun, özellikle yazma kaygısının öğrenci performansı ve kendini ifade etme önünde engel teşkil ettiği ortamlarda, pedagojik uygulamalarda kaçınılmaz bir değişim haline geldiğini vurgulamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment

Öz

This study aimed to bring together the literature on the impacts of formative assessment practices on students' writing anxiety, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. Writing anxiety is a multifaceted phenomenon that negatively affects writing performance, motivation, and academic engagement of students. The review synthesized evidence from empirical research and theoretical discussions, highlighting the efficacy of formative assessment practices such as timely feedback, peer review, self-assessment, and metacognitive reflection in alleviating anxiety and building writing self-efficacy. The studies included in this review were selected from peer-reviewed journal articles published in the last twenty years, using keyword searches such as 'formative assessment,' 'writing anxiety,' and 'EFL learners' across databases. Selection criteria focused on empirical relevance, methodological clarity, and thematic alignment with the review's objectives. The integration of such practices allows students to perceive writing as a developmental and supportive process, rather than a performance task. The study indicated that formative assessment not only enhanced students' emotional state but also played a decisive role in their academic growth and autonomy as writers. Therefore, the current study has highlighted that the integration of formative assessment in teaching writing has become the unavoidable shift in pedagogical practice, particularly in settings where writing anxiety is a barrier to student performance and expression.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Al-Mofti, K. (2020). Challenges of implementing formative assessment. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v3n1y2020.pp181-189
Ariartha, K., Riwayatiningsih, R., & Susanti, Y. (2023). Male and female differences of writing anxiety. Fonologi, 1(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v1i3.31
Astari, D., Padmadewi, N., & Dewi, N. (2023). The implementation of assessment in teaching English in Merdeka curriculum. Journey (Journal of English Language and Pedagogy), 6(2), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i2.3182
Baker, J., & Moore, S. (2008). Distress, coping, and blogging: Comparing new MySpace users by their intention to blog. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9930
Bashir, S., Karim, T., & Akram, N. (2020). Teachers focus to practice formative assessment techniques and Blooms Taxonomy: Assessment of class practices of prospective teachers. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences , 7(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(116-125)
Begum, M., Ambreen, M., & Khan, N. (2020). Adjustment in instructional techniques through formative assessment data and evidence. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (RJSSER), 1(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss3-2020(212-217)
Busby, D., & Malone, C. (2023). Writing circles: Developing learner self-efficacy and agency through peer review activities. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (27). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi27.872
Busse, V., Graham, S., Müller, N., & Utesch, T. (2023). Understanding the interplay between text quality, writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in learners with and without migration background. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130149

Coghlan, D., & Casey, M. (2001). Action research from the inside: Issues and challenges in doing action research in your own hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01899.x
Cross, T., & Palese, K. (2015). Increasing learning: Classroom assessment techniques in the online classroom. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.1023594
Fan, C., & Wang, J. (2024). Configurational impact of self-regulated writing strategy, writing anxiety, and perceived writing difficulty on EFL writing performance: An fsQCA approach. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61537-x
Fatima, N., & Usmani, A. (2022). Expectation and satisfaction level of students with impact of formative assessment on the scores of summative assessments in the subject of dental materials—A study from private dental college Karachi Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association, 31(4), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.25301/jpda.314.165
Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., & Safdari, M. (2020). The impact of portfolio-based writing instruction on writing performance and anxiety of EFL students. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 51(3) 226–235. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2020.134729
Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 823–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823
Frattaroli, J., Thomas, M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Opening up in the classroom: Effects of expressive writing on graduate school entrance exam performance. Emotion, 11(3), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022946
Haugen, H., & Lange, T. (2024). Multiple choice as formative assessment in dental education. European Journal of Dental Education, 28(3), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.13002
He, W., Li, S., & Zhang, Y. (2023). An investigation of Chinese high school students’ EI, English writing anxiety and performance. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Educational Innovation and Development (EID 2023) (pp. 139–145). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-97-8_18
Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2016). Graduate students as academic writers: Writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
Jennifer, J., & Ponniah, R. (2017). Investigating the levels, types and causes of second language writing anxiety among Indian freshmen. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 14(3), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.3.13.557
Kausar, F. N., & Haroon, A. (2022). Relationship between Formative Assessment Techniques, Students’ Learning and Academic Achievement at University Level. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-iii)26
Khosravi, R., Dastgoshadeh, A., & Jalilzadeh, K. (2023). Writing metacognitive strategy-based instruction through flipped classroom: An investigation of writing performance, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00264-8
Kurniasih, K., Hidayanti, I., & Anggraini, M. (2023). Are girls more anxious than boys? The analysis of writing anxiety on writing achievement. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Social Science and Education Research (ICSSER) (pp. 153–164). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-040-4_15
Kusumaningputri, R., Ningsih, T., & Wisasongko, W. (2018). Second language writing anxiety of Indonesian EFL students. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 357. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4268
Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2020). Formative assessment as practice: The role of students’ motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228
Lena, N., Jaya, A., & Mursalim, M. (2019). An analysis of students’ anxiety and self-efficacy in writing at English Department of Halu Oleo University. Journal of Teaching English, 4(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.36709/jte.v4i2.13916
Luning, Z. (2024). English writing anxiety in Chinese high school students: Causes and consequences. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 58(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/58/20241691
Mehri, S., Choi, J., D’Haro, L., Deriu, J., Eskénazi, M., Gašić, M., … & Zhang, C. (2022). Report from the NSF future directions workshop on automatic evaluation of dialog: Research directions and challenges. arXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.10012
Morris, S., & Vollmer, T. (2021). Evaluating the function of social interaction for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(4), 1456–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.850
Nugraheni, D. (2023). Mapping undergraduate EFL students’ writing anxiety: Trajectories from responses, reasons, and strategies. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching), 10(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v10i2.9452
Ozan, C., & Kıncal, R. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0216
Pelch, M. (2018). Gendered differences in academic emotions and their implications for student success in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0130-7
Perera, C., Zainuddin, Z., Piaw, C., Lee, K., & Asirvatham, D. (2020). The pedagogical frontiers of urban higher education: Blended learning and co-lecturing. Education and Urban Society, 52(9), 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124519894966
Pizzie, R., McDermott, C., Salem, T., & Kraemer, D. (2020). Neural evidence for cognitive reappraisal as a strategy to alleviate the effects of math anxiety. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(12), 1271–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa161
Rasuan, Z., & Wati, L. (2021). Students’ writing anxiety and its correlation with their writing performance. EEDJ (English Education Journal), 1(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.32923/eedj.v1i1.1773
Riggle, E., Gonzalez, K., Rostosky, S., & Black, W. (2014). Cultivating positive LGBTQA identities: An intervention study with college students. Journal of LGBTQ Issues in Counseling, 8(3), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2014.933468
Rowell, L., Inoue, N., & Getz, C. (2014). Reflective practice and motion sickness: Thoughts on the first North American Action Research Study Day. Educational Action Research, 22(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.859090
Rozek, C., Ramirez, G., Fine, R., & Beilock, S. (2019). Reducing socioeconomic disparities in the STEM pipeline through student emotion regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(5), 1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808589116
Sabti, A., Rashid, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Darmi, R. (2019). The impact of writing anxiety, writing achievement motivation, and writing self-efficacy on writing performance: A correlational study of Iraqi tertiary EFL learners. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019894289
Sarkhoush, H. (2013). Relationship among Iranian EFL learners’ self-efficacy in writing, attitude towards writing, writing apprehension and writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 1126–1132. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.1126-1132
Shodiq, S., Syamsudin, S., & Najib, K. (2023). Implementing applications for formative assessment to enhance teacher competence in learning assessment. ICCS, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/iccs.v1i2.163
Soleimani, H., Hamasaid, H., & Saheb, B. (2020). L2 writing anxiety, writing self-efficacy and writing motivation. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v3n1y2020.pp156-165
Sun, J., Motevalli, S., & Chan, N. N. (2024). Exploring writing anxiety during writing process: An analysis of perceptions in Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Qualitative Research in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.12938
Teng, M. (2024). Understanding anxiety, self-efficacy, and motivation in online English learning. TESL-EJ, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108int
Trinh, A. (2024). Classroom-based assessment in TEFL as a form of formative assessment: Enquiries into theory and practice. WoPaLP, 18. https://doi.org/10.61425/wplp.2023.18.80.102
Tsiriotakis, I., Vassilaki, Ε., Spantidakis, Ι., & Stavrou, N. (2017). The examination of the effects of writing strategy-based procedural facilitative environments on students' English foreign language writing anxiety levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02074
Tunagür, M. (2021). The effect of peer assessment application on writing anxiety and writing motivation of 6th grade students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i1.4352
Turysbayeva, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Yessenova, K., Tursynay, B., & Maigeldiyeva, S. (2023). The impact of formative assessment techniques on students' self-assessment skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(4), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5045
Voitkiv, H., & Lishchynskyy, I. (2021). Formative assessment as a means of forming the pupil's learning trajectory. Sciencerise Pedagogical Education, (6)(45), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2021.247725
Wahyuni, D., Oktavia, W., & Marlina, L. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesian EFL college students: Levels, causes, and coping strategies. Lingua Cultura, 13(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i1.5239
Wahyuni, S., & Umam, C. (2017). An analysis on writing anxiety of Indonesian EFL college learners. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v4i1.333
Wylie, E., & Lyon, C. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.990416
Yan, L. (2019). A review on writing anxiety and metacognitive strategy in the process of EFL writing. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM-18). https://doi.org/10.2991/icem-18.2019.4
Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. (2015). Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002
Yazidi, R. (2023). Investigating the influence of formative assessment on the learning process in the English language classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v9i1.4540

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Halil Sarı ^*
0000-0003-2560-2799
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

25 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1747628

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28HS46AL

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sarı, H. (2026). From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1747628

AMA

1.Sarı H. From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment. CUE. 2026;15(1):249-264. doi:10.30703/cije.1747628

Chicago

Sarı, Halil. 2026. “From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment”. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi 15 (1): 249-64. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1747628.

EndNote

Sarı H (01 Mayıs 2026) From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi 15 1 249–264.

IEEE

[1]H. Sarı, “From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment”, CUE, c. 15, sy 1, ss. 249–264, May. 2026, doi: 10.30703/cije.1747628.

ISNAD

Sarı, Halil. “From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment”. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi 15/1 (01 Mayıs 2026): 249-264. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1747628.

JAMA

1.Sarı H. From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment. CUE. 2026;15:249–264.

MLA

Sarı, Halil. “From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment”. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, c. 15, sy 1, Mayıs 2026, ss. 249-64, doi:10.30703/cije.1747628.

Vancouver

1.Halil Sarı. From Anxiety to Success: Addressing Writing Anxiety Through Implementing Formative Assessment. CUE. 01 Mayıs 2026;15(1):249-64. doi:10.30703/cije.1747628