Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigation of the Relationship Between Decision-Making Skills and Self-Regulation Skills of Classroom Teachers

Year 2021, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 1490 - 1506, 30.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.858711

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to examine the relationship between classroom teachers' decision-making skills and self-regulation skills in the direction of the mixed research method. This study is conducted with explanatory sequential design, one of the mixed research designs. The first stage of the study, quantitative study, is conducted with the classroom teachers working in Aziziye, Palandöken and Yakutiye countries of Erzurum province in 2018-2019 academic years. The quantitative dimension of the study was conducted with 345 primary school teachers selected with the purposive sampling method, and the qualitative dimension was conducted with 50 classroom teachers selected with purposeful sampling among the teachers in the study group. The quantitative data were collected through the “Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire” and the “Self-Regulation Questionnaire”, and the qualitative data were collected through the “Structured Interview Protocol”. According to the quantitative findings obtained from the study, it has been determined that self-regulation skills have a negative relationship with self-esteem in decision-making and have a positive relationship with decision styles. However, the self-monitoring sub-dimension of self-regulation has been found to be the most powerful predictor of decision-making skills. From the analysis of the structured interview protocols applied in the qualitative dimension, it has been seen that the teachers think that there is a relationship between self-regulation and decision-making skills and they more likely evaluate this relationship as self-regulation skill predicts the decision-making skills. Accordingly, it has been determined that the findings obtained through qualitative methods explain and support the quantitative findings.

References

  • Aksoy, A. and Tozduman-Yaralı, K. (2017). An analysis of children's self regulations and play skills according to gender. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(2), 442-455. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.304124
  • Arslan, Ç. and Yılmaz, A.S. (2015). Analyzing decision making styles and selfesteem at decision making of university students regarding to shyness and self-esteem. British Journal of Education, Society, Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 227-234. doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2015/16123
  • Atsan, N. (2017). A cultural examination of the relationship between decisional selfesteem and conflict theory of decision making. The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Suleyman Demirel University, 22(1), 63-73.
  • Avşaroğlu, S. and Üre, Ö. (2007). The study of styles of coping with stress, decision-making and self-esteem of university students on decision-making in terms of self-esteem and some variables. The Journal of Institute of Social Science, 18, 85-100.
  • Aydın, S. (2012). The effects of project-based learning environment on preservice biology teachers? Self-regulation levels and self-efficacy beliefs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara
  • Aydın, S., Özer-Keskin, M. and Yel. M. (2013). Turkish adaptation of the self-regulation questionnaire: A study on validity and reliability. Turkısh Journal of Education, 3(1), 28-32. doi:10.19128/turje.67946
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Educational skills training of the trainer. İstanbul:Kariyer Publications.
  • Baumann, M. R., Sniezek, J.A. and Buerkel, C. A. (2001). Self-evaluation, stress and performance: A model of decision making under acute stress. In E. Salas and G. Klein (Eds.) Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making, 139-158. New York.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific research methods. Ankara: PegemA Publications.
  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C. and Reynolds. M. (1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulation perspective. Child Development 70(5), 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00082
  • Creswell, J.W. (2017). A concise ıntroductıon to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J.W. and Plano-Clark, W. L. (2015). Desining and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Çelik-Ercoşkun, N. and Köse, E. (2014). Investigation of self-regulation and problem solving skills of prospective elementary teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 413-428. doi:10.15345/iojes.2014.02.014
  • Çorapçı, A. (2015). Decision making style and the setermination of the level of job satisfaction of teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman.
  • Demirbaş-Nemli, B. (2018). A model application for development of cognitive decision making skills of primary school 4th class students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Deniz, M. E. (2004). Investigation of the relation between decision making self-esteem, decision making style and problem solving skills of university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,15, 23 – 35.
  • Develioğlu, M. (2006). Examination of the decision making strategies of university students who have yigher and lower problem solving skills from the point of view of some variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  • Englert, C. S. and Semmel, M. I. (1983). Spontaneous teacher decision making in interactive instructional contexts. Journal of Educational Research, 77(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885508
  • Eskiocak, S. (2005). The analyzes of the factors which affected the primary school teachers’ making decision process in their planning for education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çukurova University, Çukurova.
  • Gılıç, F. (2015). The study of relationship between the teachers' level of participation in decision-making, school culture and teachers' level of readiness for change (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mersin University, Mersin.
  • Gönen, Z. (2016). The relationship between the teachers' decision-making processes and organizational commitment levels (Kars example) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.
  • Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham. W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
  • Güler, M. (2015). Investigating of teacher candidates' self regulated learning in terms of emotional intelligence, epistemological beliefs and some variables (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.
  • Halama, P. (2017). Self-regulation capacity and decision making of slovak managers in routine situations and in situations with possible negative outcomes. Studia Psychologica, 59(2), 156-168. doi: 10.21909/sp.2017.02.737
  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  • Kırgil, F. (2015). The examine the decision-making and assertiveness levels of physical education teachers and other branch teachers in terms of some variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fırat University, Elazığ.
  • Klimczak, A. K., Balli, S. J. and Wedman, J. F. (1995). Teacher decision making regarding content structure: A study of novice and experienced teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(4), 330-341.
  • Kuku, S. M. and Taylor, J. W. (2002). Teachers’ participating in decision making: A comparative study of school leader and teacher perceptions in north philippine academies. International Forum Journal, 5(1), 19-46.
  • Mann L., Radford, M., Burnett, P., Ford, ., Bond, M., Leung, K., Nakamura, H., Vaughan, G. and Yang, K. S. (1998). Cross-cultual differences in self-reported decision making style and confidence. International Journal Of Psychology, 33, 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075998400213
  • Miles, M, B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Özkurt, E. (2013). The relationship between decision-making strategies and empathic skills of administrators and teachers in governmental primary schools (Kadıköy case study) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yeditepe Universitiy,İstanbul.
  • Ruban, L. and Reis, S. M. (2006). Patterns of self‐regulatory strategy use among low‐achieving and high‐achieving university students. Roeper Review 28(3), 148–156. doi:10.1080/02783190609554354
  • Saracaloğlu, A.S., Aldan-Karademir, Ç., Dursun, F., Altın, M. and Üstündağ, N. (2017). The relationship between self-regulation learning skills, academic self-efficacy, gocus of academic control and academic acievement of prospective primary school teachers International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12(33), 379-402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/T
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2010). Development learning and teaching. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Shavelson, R. J. (1983). Review of research teachers’ pedagogical on judgments, plans and decisions. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1086/461323
  • Temel, V. (2015). A study about problem solving skills, styles of making decisions and anger types of physical education and sports teachers (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Tecnichal University, Trabzon.
  • Thien, L. M. and Adams, D. (2019). Distrubed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment to change in Malaysian primary schools: The contextual influence of gender and teaching experience. Education Studies, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2019.1680349
  • Tuncer, M. and Bahadır, F. (2017). Evaluation of perceptions of metacognitive thinking skills and success relations of teacher's candidates in terms of various variables. Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches, 6 (2), 1326-1343.
  • Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J. V. and Petegem, P. V. (2016). Data use by teachers: The impact of motivation, decision-making style, supportive relationships and reflective capacity. Educational Studies, 42(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1148582
  • Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R.F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M. and Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices ımpairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, 94(5), 883–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publications.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Karar Verme Becerileri ile Öz Düzenleme Becerileri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 1490 - 1506, 30.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.858711

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, sınıf öğretmenlerinin karar verme becerileri ile öz düzenleme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin karma araştırma yöntemi doğrultusunda incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırma, karma araştırma yöntemlerinden olan açımlayıcı sıralı desen çerçevesinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın ilk aşaması olan nicel çalışma, 2018-2019 eğitim-öğretim yılında Erzurum ili Aziziye, Palandöken ve Yakutiye ilçelerinde bulunan sınıf öğretmenleri ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın nicel boyutu, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 345 sınıf öğretmeni, nitel boyutu ise çalışma grubundaki öğretmenler arasından amaçlı örnekleme yoluyla seçilen 50 sınıf öğretmeni ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın nicel verileri “Melbourne Karar Verme Ölçeği” ve “Öz Düzenleme Ölçeği” ile nitel verileri ise araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan “Yapılandırılmış Görüşme Formu” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen nicel bulgular doğrultusunda öz düzenleme becerisinin karar vermede öz saygı ile negatif, karar stilleri ile pozitif ilişkisi olduğu saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte karar verme becerisinin en güçlü yordayıcısının öz düzenleme alt boyutlarından öz izleme olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Nitel boyutta uygulanan yapılandırılmış görüşme formlarının analizinden ise öğretmenlerin öz düzenleme becerisi ve karar verme becerisi arasında ilişki olduğunu düşündükleri görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte öğretmenlerin karar verme becerisi ile öz düzenleme becerisi arasındaki ilişkiyi daha çok öz düzenleme becerisinin karar verme becerisini yordaması yönünde değerlendirdikleri analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda nitel yöntemlerle elde edilen bulguların nicel bulguları açıkladığı ve desteklediği belirlenmiştir.

References

  • Aksoy, A. and Tozduman-Yaralı, K. (2017). An analysis of children's self regulations and play skills according to gender. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(2), 442-455. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.304124
  • Arslan, Ç. and Yılmaz, A.S. (2015). Analyzing decision making styles and selfesteem at decision making of university students regarding to shyness and self-esteem. British Journal of Education, Society, Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 227-234. doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2015/16123
  • Atsan, N. (2017). A cultural examination of the relationship between decisional selfesteem and conflict theory of decision making. The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Suleyman Demirel University, 22(1), 63-73.
  • Avşaroğlu, S. and Üre, Ö. (2007). The study of styles of coping with stress, decision-making and self-esteem of university students on decision-making in terms of self-esteem and some variables. The Journal of Institute of Social Science, 18, 85-100.
  • Aydın, S. (2012). The effects of project-based learning environment on preservice biology teachers? Self-regulation levels and self-efficacy beliefs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara
  • Aydın, S., Özer-Keskin, M. and Yel. M. (2013). Turkish adaptation of the self-regulation questionnaire: A study on validity and reliability. Turkısh Journal of Education, 3(1), 28-32. doi:10.19128/turje.67946
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Educational skills training of the trainer. İstanbul:Kariyer Publications.
  • Baumann, M. R., Sniezek, J.A. and Buerkel, C. A. (2001). Self-evaluation, stress and performance: A model of decision making under acute stress. In E. Salas and G. Klein (Eds.) Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making, 139-158. New York.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific research methods. Ankara: PegemA Publications.
  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C. and Reynolds. M. (1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulation perspective. Child Development 70(5), 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00082
  • Creswell, J.W. (2017). A concise ıntroductıon to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J.W. and Plano-Clark, W. L. (2015). Desining and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Çelik-Ercoşkun, N. and Köse, E. (2014). Investigation of self-regulation and problem solving skills of prospective elementary teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 413-428. doi:10.15345/iojes.2014.02.014
  • Çorapçı, A. (2015). Decision making style and the setermination of the level of job satisfaction of teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman.
  • Demirbaş-Nemli, B. (2018). A model application for development of cognitive decision making skills of primary school 4th class students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Deniz, M. E. (2004). Investigation of the relation between decision making self-esteem, decision making style and problem solving skills of university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,15, 23 – 35.
  • Develioğlu, M. (2006). Examination of the decision making strategies of university students who have yigher and lower problem solving skills from the point of view of some variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  • Englert, C. S. and Semmel, M. I. (1983). Spontaneous teacher decision making in interactive instructional contexts. Journal of Educational Research, 77(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885508
  • Eskiocak, S. (2005). The analyzes of the factors which affected the primary school teachers’ making decision process in their planning for education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çukurova University, Çukurova.
  • Gılıç, F. (2015). The study of relationship between the teachers' level of participation in decision-making, school culture and teachers' level of readiness for change (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mersin University, Mersin.
  • Gönen, Z. (2016). The relationship between the teachers' decision-making processes and organizational commitment levels (Kars example) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.
  • Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham. W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
  • Güler, M. (2015). Investigating of teacher candidates' self regulated learning in terms of emotional intelligence, epistemological beliefs and some variables (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.
  • Halama, P. (2017). Self-regulation capacity and decision making of slovak managers in routine situations and in situations with possible negative outcomes. Studia Psychologica, 59(2), 156-168. doi: 10.21909/sp.2017.02.737
  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  • Kırgil, F. (2015). The examine the decision-making and assertiveness levels of physical education teachers and other branch teachers in terms of some variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fırat University, Elazığ.
  • Klimczak, A. K., Balli, S. J. and Wedman, J. F. (1995). Teacher decision making regarding content structure: A study of novice and experienced teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(4), 330-341.
  • Kuku, S. M. and Taylor, J. W. (2002). Teachers’ participating in decision making: A comparative study of school leader and teacher perceptions in north philippine academies. International Forum Journal, 5(1), 19-46.
  • Mann L., Radford, M., Burnett, P., Ford, ., Bond, M., Leung, K., Nakamura, H., Vaughan, G. and Yang, K. S. (1998). Cross-cultual differences in self-reported decision making style and confidence. International Journal Of Psychology, 33, 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075998400213
  • Miles, M, B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Özkurt, E. (2013). The relationship between decision-making strategies and empathic skills of administrators and teachers in governmental primary schools (Kadıköy case study) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yeditepe Universitiy,İstanbul.
  • Ruban, L. and Reis, S. M. (2006). Patterns of self‐regulatory strategy use among low‐achieving and high‐achieving university students. Roeper Review 28(3), 148–156. doi:10.1080/02783190609554354
  • Saracaloğlu, A.S., Aldan-Karademir, Ç., Dursun, F., Altın, M. and Üstündağ, N. (2017). The relationship between self-regulation learning skills, academic self-efficacy, gocus of academic control and academic acievement of prospective primary school teachers International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12(33), 379-402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/T
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2010). Development learning and teaching. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Shavelson, R. J. (1983). Review of research teachers’ pedagogical on judgments, plans and decisions. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1086/461323
  • Temel, V. (2015). A study about problem solving skills, styles of making decisions and anger types of physical education and sports teachers (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Tecnichal University, Trabzon.
  • Thien, L. M. and Adams, D. (2019). Distrubed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment to change in Malaysian primary schools: The contextual influence of gender and teaching experience. Education Studies, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2019.1680349
  • Tuncer, M. and Bahadır, F. (2017). Evaluation of perceptions of metacognitive thinking skills and success relations of teacher's candidates in terms of various variables. Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches, 6 (2), 1326-1343.
  • Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J. V. and Petegem, P. V. (2016). Data use by teachers: The impact of motivation, decision-making style, supportive relationships and reflective capacity. Educational Studies, 42(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1148582
  • Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R.F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M. and Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices ımpairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, 94(5), 883–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publications.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Merve Mazlumoğlu 0000-0003-2275-7429

Osman Samancı 0000-0003-3620-7604

Publication Date December 30, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021Volume: 10 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Mazlumoğlu, M., & Samancı, O. (2021). Investigation of the Relationship Between Decision-Making Skills and Self-Regulation Skills of Classroom Teachers. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 10(4), 1490-1506. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.858711

14550                 

© Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Education