The Relationship Between Teacher Classroom Leadership and Learner Autonomy: The Case of EFL Classrooms

Didem Erdel; Mehmet Takkaç

TR EN

Sınıf-içi Öğretmen Liderliği ve Öğrenen Özerkliği İlişkisi: İngilizcenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretildiği Sınıflar Örneği

Öz

Öğrenen ve öğrenme merkezli yaklaşımlar dil eğitiminde bir süredir ön planda olmakla birlikte, bu süreçte öğretmen rollerinin tamamen etkisiz kaldığını iddia etmek pek mümkün değildir. Bunun tam aksine, öğretmenlerin öğrencilere destek olması, rehberlik yapması ve öğrenmeyi kolaylaştırması öğrenen özerkliği ve öz düzenleme gibi öğrenci becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde büyük öneme sahip olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de İngilizcenin yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği sınıflarda yazma (writing) dersini veren öğretim elemanlarının sınıf liderliği stilleri ile bu öğretim elemanlarının öğrencilerinin özerk öğrenme becerileri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Öğretmenlerin liderlik stillerinin belirlenmesinde kuramsal çerçeve olarak Tam Kapsamlı Liderlik (TKL) Modeli temel alınmıştır. Araştırma deseni olarak ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmış, Sınıf Liderliği Ölçeği ve Özerk Öğrenme Ölçeğinden oluşan bir anket aracılığıyla çalışma verileri toplanmıştır. Anket, Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde İngiliz Dili Eğitimi ve İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümlerinde İngilizce yazma dersini alan toplam 305 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Toplanan nicel veriler, SPSS programı üzerinden çıkarımsal istatistiki analizlere tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmanın sonuçları, öğretmenlerin dönüşümcü ve aktif etkileşimci liderlik özelliklerinin, öğrencilerin öğrenen özerkliği ile anlamlı bir şekilde ilişkili olduğunu ve dolayısıyla, bu liderlik özelliklerini sergileyen öğretmenlerin öğrencilerinin İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenmede daha özerk olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sınıf içi öğretmen liderliği,yabancı dil olarak İngilizce sınıfları,tam kapsamlı liderlik,dönüşümcü liderlik,öğrenen özerkliği

The Relationship Between Teacher Classroom Leadership and Learner Autonomy: The Case of EFL Classrooms

Abstract

Learner- and learning-centered approaches have prevailed in language education for a while yet it is fallacious to claim that the roles of teachers have been totally inactivated. Quite the contrary, teacher support, guidance and facilitation have turned out to be of capital importance in the development of such learner skills as autonomy and self-regulation. This study sought to identify the relationship between classroom leadership styles of Turkish EFL writing instructors and the autonomous learning skills of their students. The Full Range Leadership (FRL) Model was the theoretical framework on which the determination of instructors’ leadership styles was grounded. Correlational survey was adopted as the research design, through which research data were collected via a questionnaire consisting of two independent scales, Classroom Leadership Instrument and Autonomous Learning Scale. The questionnaire was administered to 305 students from English Language Teaching and English Language and Literature Departments at a Turkish state university. Research data were analyzed through inferential statistical tests on SPSS. The results of the study revealed that transformational and active transactional leadership styles of instructors significantly correlated with learner autonomy and hence, it was inferred that the students of those instructors displaying such leadership characteristics appeared to be more autonomous in EFL learning.

Keywords

In-class teacher leadership,EFL classrooms,full range leadership,transformational leadership,learner autonomy

References

Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2002). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: JAI.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full range leadership development programs: Basic and advanced manuals. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio & Associates.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Developing potentials across a full-range of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baba, V., & Ace, M. E. (1989). Serendipity in leadership: initiating structure and consideration in the classroom. Human Relations, 42(6), 509-525. doi: 10.1177/001872678904200603
Balwant, P. T. (2016). Transformational instructor-leadership in higher education teaching: a meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(4), 20-42. doi: 10.1002/jls.21423
Balwant, P. T., Stephen, U., & Birdi, K. (2014, January). Practice what you preach: Instructors as transformational leaders in higher education classrooms. Paper presented at the 74th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, US. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5cae/a17127da453f21562b01d0710898ba01cf19.pdf
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City: Mind Garden.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006) Transformational leadership (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003958
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd edition). London, England: Pearson Education.
Benson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839-843. doi: 10.1002/tesq.134
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman.
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. (2009). Transformational leadership in the classroom: fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(4), 296-306. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ952280
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the student intellectual stimulation scale. Communication Reports, 23(2), 91-105. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2010.511399
Boyd, B. L. (2009). Using a case study to develop the transformational teaching theory. Journal of Leadership Education, 7 (6), 50-59. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1135754
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 138-157. doi: 10.1111/joop.12041
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Bruner, J. S. (1978). Learning how to do things with words. In J. S. Bruner & R. A. Garton (Eds.). Human growth and development (pp. 62-84). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Can, N. (2014). Öğretmen liderliği (4th Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Chan, V. (2003). Autonomous language learning: The teachers’ perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 33-54, doi: 10.1080/1356251032000052311
Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Teacher leadership style: a classroom-level study. Journal of Educational Administration 32(3), 54–71. doi: 10.1108/09578239410063111
Chory, R. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1080/01463379909370120
Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109-117. doi: 10.1093/elt/54.2.109 Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Den Brok, P. J. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes: a study on teachers’ thoughts and actions from an interpersonal and a learning activities perspective. Utrecht: W. C. C. Retrieved from https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1745550/Metis211815.pdf
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5
Dinçer, A. (2014). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determined engagement in Turkish EFL classrooms: a mixed methods approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr (Dissertation no: 366530)
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2009). Group dynamics in the language classroom (4th Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Reflecting on teacher-student relations in TESOL. ELT Journal, 69 (1), 26-34. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccu033
Gai, L. (2005). The influence of teacher-student relationships on English teaching effectiveness: perceptions of students in a Chinese university (MSc thesis). University of Windsor, Canada.
Galland, C. (2008). Effective teacher leadership: a quantitative study of the relationship between school structures and effective teacher leaders. (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/5605/research.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Gilbert, M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & St-Hilaire, F. (2017). Transformational leadership and autonomy support management behaviors: the role of specificity in predicting employees’ psychological health. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 320-332. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-08-2015-0173
Gözükara, I., & Şimşek Ö. F. (2015). Linking transformational leadership to work engagement and mediator effect of job autonomy: a study in a Turkish private non-profit university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.274
Harrison, J. L. (2013). The effects of instructor transformational leadership and verbal immediacy on learner autonomy and creativity in online contexts (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3570899)
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Illés, E. (2012). Learner autonomy revisited. ELT Journal, 66(4), 505-513. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccs044
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: a Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191-206. Retrieved from https://www.tlu.ee/~kpata/haridustehnoloogiaTLU/sociocultural.pdf
Kayı-Aydar, H. (2013). Scaffolding language learning in an academic ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 67 (3), 324-335. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct016
Koh, C. H., & Tan, T. M. (1997). Empirical investigation of the factors affecting SET results. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(4), 170-178. doi: 10.1108/095135549710186272
Koh, S. E. (2008). Leadership and management skills of preservice teachers. (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3308408)
Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., Jonas, K., van Quaquebeke, N., & van Dick, R. (2012). How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees’ needs as mediating links. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 1031-1052. doi: 10.1002/job.1771
Lee, I. (1998). Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 52(4), 282-290. doi: 10.1093/elt/52.4.282
Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213.doi: 10.1002/tesq.153
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(2), 222-233. doi: 10.1017/S0261444808005636
Little, D. (2012). The common European framework of reference for languages and the European language portfolio: Some history, a view of language learner autonomy, and some implications for language learning in higher education. De Gruyter Mouton, 2 (1), 1-16. doi: 10.1515/cercles-2012-0001
Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00039-5 Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian Context. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.1.71
Macaskill, A., & Taylor, E. (2010). The development of a brief measure of learner autonomy in university students. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 351-359. doi: 10.1080/030750709003502703
Oğuz, A. (2013). Developing a scale for learner autonomy support. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 2187-2194. doi: 10.12738/estp.2013.4.1870
Peer, K. S., & McClendon, R C. (2002). Sociocultural learning theory in practice: Implications for athletic training educators. Journal of Athletic Training, 37(4), 136-140. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC164414/ Pounder, J. S. (2004). The classroom leadership styles of Hong Kong university teachers: A case study of teachers in a business school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. U187876)
Pounder, J. S. (2005). Transformational classroom leadership: Developing the teacher leadership notion. HKIBS Working Paper Series 056-045. Retrieved from: http://commons.ln.edu.hk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=hkibswp
Pounder, J. S. (2006). Transformational classroom leadership: The fourth wave of teacher leadership? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 533-545. doi: 10.1177/1741143206068216
Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312-330. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0975
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183-202). Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.
Rowold, J. (2005). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the German translation by Jens Rowold. Redwood City: Mind Garden.
Sanocki, S. J. (2013). The process of how teachers become teacher leaders and how teacher leadership becomes distributed within a school: a grounded theory research study. (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/171/
Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teacher College Records, 102(4), 779-804. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00077
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: theoretical underpinnings, principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24 (4), 569-608. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 62(4), 395-397. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn038
Stein, L. (2010). Lead students – don’t manage them. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(4), 82-86. doi: 10.1177/003172171009100421
Stewart, T. (2012). Classroom teacher leadership: Service-learning for teacher sense of efficacy and servant leadership development. School Leadership & Management, 32(3), 233-259. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2012.688741
Treslan, D. L. (2006). Transformational leadership in the classroom: Any evidence? Education Canada, 46(2), 58-62. Retrieved from https://www.edcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/EdCan-2006-v46-n2-Treslan.pdf
Vondey, M. (2008). Follower-focused leadership: Effects of follower self-concepts and self-determination on organizational citizenship behavior. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 1(1), 52-61. Retrieved from https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/elj/issue1/home.htm
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Z., & Gagné, M. (2013). A Chinese-Canadian cross-cultural investigation of transformational leadership, autonomous motivation and collectivistic value. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 134-142. doi: 10.1177/1548051812465895
Weaver, R. R., & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: college students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570-601. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772299
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationship in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003255
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35-58. doi: 10.2307/40264510

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Didem Erdel ^*
0000-0002-3923-4934
Türkiye

Mehmet Takkaç
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 23, 2019

Submission Date

April 4, 2019

Acceptance Date

July 29, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 8 Number: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43YS89TF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Erdel, D., & Takkaç, M. (2019). The Relationship Between Teacher Classroom Leadership and Learner Autonomy: The Case of EFL Classrooms. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 8(3), 752-770. https://izlik.org/JA43YS89TF

Sınıf-içi Öğretmen Liderliği ve Öğrenen Özerkliği İlişkisi: İngilizcenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretildiği Sınıflar Örneği

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Relationship Between Teacher Classroom Leadership and Learner Autonomy: The Case of EFL Classrooms

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite

© Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Education