EN
TR
How To Run A School? A school review
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate a school in Sivas in line with the reflections of the school principal's life experiences on the school, the school's management activities and processes, and the opinions of school administrators and teachers, and to suggest a school management process. Qualitative research and case study methods were adopted in the research. Criterion and convenience sampling methods were used to select the participants. The sample of the study consisted of 1 administrator and 22 teachers working in a school in Sivas in the fall semester of the 2018-2019 academic year. The researchers collected the data using a semi-structured interview form they had developed and analysed the data using descriptive analysis. The researchers looked at the school administrator's life in terms of personality traits and communication and examined the administrator's leadership and supervision approach. The school's bureaucratic functioning, its strengths, weaknesses, vision, and mission were examined by paying attention the administrator's perspective. The methods used by the administrator to resolve conflict, ensure discipline, increase success and teacher motivation, and the academic, social, and administrative projects they developed were examined. The administrator's interactions with and demands and expectations from students, teachers, and parents were studied. The researchers proposed a school management process based on the findings.
Keywords
References
- Agih, A. A. (2015). Effective school management and supervision: Imperative for quality Education service delivery. African Research Review, 9(3), 62-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v9i3.6
- Açıkalın, A. (1998). Teknik ve toplumsal yönleriyle okul yöneticiliği. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
- Ada, Ş., Çelik, Z., Küçükali, R. ve Manafzadehtabriz, S. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin iletişim becerilerine ilişkin yönetici ve öğretmenlerin algılama düzeyleri (Erzurum ili örneği). Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1), 101-114. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/ 2838/38748
- Akinnubi, O. P., Gbadeyan, C. O., Fashiku, C. O., and Kayode, D. J. (2012). Effective communication: A tool for improvement of secondary school management. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(7), 105-110.
- Aksu, A. (2009). Kriz yönetimi ve vizyoner liderlik. Journal of Yaşar University, 4(15), 2435-2450. https://dergipark.org.tr/ en/pub/jyasar/issue/19127/202971
- Aküzüm, C. (2017). Kurucu müdürlerinin okul yönetimi bağlamında karşılaştıkları temel yönetsel sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16 (60), 161-185. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.289659
- Altınkurt, Y. ve Yılmaz, K. (2011). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim okullarının vizyon, misyon ve değerleri ile ilgili bir çözümleme. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 23,1-15
- Aydoğan, İ. (2002). Etkili yönetim. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13, 61-75 . Bakioğlu, A. (2016). Türk eğitim sistemi ve okul yönetimi. Ankara: Nobel yayıncılık.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
March 28, 2022
Submission Date
March 5, 2021
Acceptance Date
September 27, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 11 Number: 1
APA
Koç, B., & Doğan, S. (2022). Okul Yönetimi Nasıl Olmalıdır? Bir Okul İncelemesi. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 11(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.891520
Cited By
Examination of Science Teachers’ Burnout Levels in Terms of School Climate and Various Variables
e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1380100