Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course

Şenel Elaldı

doi:10.30703/cije.468442

TR EN

Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı Dersi Kapsamında Materyal Geliştirme ve Sunum Sürecinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Sınıf Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalında 2017-2018 yılı bahar yarı döneminde öğrenimlerini sürdüren 2. Sınıf öğrencilerinin Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı dersi kapsamında hazırladıkları materyalleri geliştirme ve sunum sürecinin bu dersi alan 52 ikinci sınıf öğretmen adayının (33 kız, 19 erkek) görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesini kapsamaktadır. Veriler, araştırmacı tarafından araştırmanın amacına göre hazırlanmış beş yarı yapılandırılmış sorudan oluşan bir görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Veriler Maxqda 11 nitel veri analizi programı ve betimsel analiz tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Ana kategoriler ve temalar oluşturulduktan sonra, görüşlerden elde edilen kodlar temalar altında sıralanmıştır. Bulgular, ikinci sınıf öğretmen adaylarının, materyallerin geliştirilmesi ve sunum süreci hakkında olumlu düşüncelere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, materyal hazırlama ve sunum aşamalarına yönelik yaşanılan zorluklar da ortaya çıkmıştır. Dönem sonunda, öğrenciler tarafından hazırlanan materyallerin diğer öğretmenler ve öğrenciler tarafından ziyaret edilerek görülmesi açısından sergilenmesi önerilmektedir. Diğer bir öneride bu materyallerin yakınlardaki okullar veya köy okulları ile paylaşılarak öğrenme- öğretme sürecinde kullanılmasını içermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sınıf öğretmenliği ikinci sınıf öğretmen adayları,materyal geliştirme,öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı dersi,ders planı,Maxqda 11

Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the development and presentation process of materials prepared by sophomores studying in the Department of Elementary Education in the Faculty of Education at Cumhuriyet University in the spring semester of 2017-2018 academic year within the scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design course in accordance with the views of 52 sophomore preservice primary teachers (33 females, 19 males) taking this course in this term. An interview form including five semi structured questions and prepared by the researcher was used as a tool for the collection of data. The data were analyzed using Maxqda11, qualitative data analysis software, and descriptive analysis technique. After generating main categories and themes, codes obtained from the views were arranged according to the themes. The findings disclosed that sophomore preservice primary teachers had positive opinions about the development and presentation process of materials. However, regarding preparing a material and preparing a presentation themes, the participants also mentioned some difficulties they experienced during this process. At the end of the term, exhibition of the prepared materials by students was suggested for other teachers and students to visit and see them. Another suggestion includes sharing the materials prepared by the students within the scope of the ITMD course with nearby schools or village schools so that they make use of them in their teaching- learning process.

Keywords

material development,Instructional Technologies and Material Design course,Sophomore preservice primary teachers,lesson plan,Maxqda 11

References

Akçay, H., Tüysüz, C., Feyzioğlu, B.,& Oğuz, B. (2008). Bilgisayar tabanlı ve bilgisayar destekli kimya öğretiminin öğrenci tutum ve başarısına etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 169-181.
Barnard, R. & Zemach, D. (2003). Materials for specific purposes. In Tomlinson, B. (ed). Developing Materials for Language Teaching, London: Continuum: 306-323.
Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information. Sage: Cleveland
Chlan, L., Halcón, L., Kreitzer, M., & Leonard, B. (2005). Selected complementary therapy skills influence of an experiential education session on nursing students' confidence levels in performing. Complementary Health Practice Review, 10, 189-201 DOI: 10.1177/1533210105284044.
Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
D’Andrea, L., Waters, C. & Rudd, R. (2011). Using computer assisted qualitative software (CAQDAS) to evaluate a novel teaching method for introductory statistics. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 48-60
Demirel, Ö.,Seferoğlu, S.S., Yağcı, E. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: PegemA.
Ferguson, L. M. (1996). Preceptors enhance students’ self-confidence. Nursing Connections, 9 (1), 49-61.

Georgina, D. A. & Hosford, C. C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 690– 696
Hamza, M. (2012). Developing training material guide. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB). Retrieved from https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/26433.pdf
Hartland, W., Biddle, C., & Fallacaro, M. (2008). Audiovisual facilitation of clinical knowledge: A paradigm for dispersed student education based on Paivio’s dual coding theory. AANA Journal, 7(63), 194-198.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th Ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall, USA.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41,111–127.
Hine, L.R. (2006). Development of student nurse self-confidence in clinical practice. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho, the USA. UMI Number: 3250635
Inal, K. (2005). Yeni ilköğretim müfredatının felsefesi. Muhafazakar Düşünce 6, 75-92.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 191-201. DOI: 10.3102/0034654311403323
Khadjooi, K., Rostami, K.,& Ishaq, S. (2011). How to use Gagne's model of instructional design in teaching psychomotor skills. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench, 4(3), 116-119.
Lazar, E. (2017). Effectiveness of audio visual aids in English language learning. The Literary Herald Journal, 3 (3), 78-90.
Li, N. (2012). Approaches to learning: Literature review. International Baccalaureate Organization. Retrieved From https://www.ibo.org/globalassets/publications/ib-research/approachestolearningeng.pdf
Link, A. N., Swann, C. A., & Bozeman, B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363-374.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271–290
Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2004). Programların geliştirilmesini gerekli kılan nedenler. [Online] Available from: http://programlar.meb.gov.tr/prog_giris/prog_giris11.html
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
Niemantsverdriet, J.W. (2000). How to give successful oral and poster presentations. Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology
Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://www.eng.auth.gr/~chemtech/foititika/various/niemantsverdriet_2000_presentations_howto.pdf
Oblinger , D. (2005). Leading the Transition from Classrooms to Learning Spaces: The convergence of technology, pedagogy, and space can lead to exciting new models of campus interaction. Educase Quarterly, 1, 14-18
Opacic, D. A. (2003). The relationship between self-efficacy and student physician assistant clinical performance. Journal of Allied Health, 32 (3), 158-166.
Pang, M. (2016). Companion guides for lesson planning: a planning template and the lesson plan pro forma. ELT Journal, 7(4), 444-454. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccw053
Rasul, S., Bukhsh,Q., Batoolc, S. (2011). A study to analyse the effectiveness of audio-visual aids in teaching learning process at university level. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 28 (1), 78 – 81.
Rice, P. L., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. South Melbourne (Australia): Oxford University Press.
Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 64(1), 28-43.
Sheldon, K., & Elliot, A. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.
Tutty, L.M., Rothery, M. S. & Grinnell, R.M. (1996).Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps and tasks. London: Allyn & Bacon
Uzungöz, A., Aktepe, V., & Gündüz, M. (2017). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı dersinin, mesleki açıdan kazandırdıklarına ilişkin öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri: Nitel bir çalışma. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 5(3), 317-339. DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148- 2624.1.5c3s14m
Yalın, H.İ. (2002). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Yaşar, O. (2004, İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler derslerinde görsel materyal kullanımı ile coğrafya konularının eğitim ve öğretimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 163.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
YÖK (1998). Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları. Ankara: Y.Ö.K.
Zhou, Q., Zhao, Y., Hu, J., Liu, Y., & Xing, L. (2010). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitude toward ICT in Xian. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1407–1414.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Şenel Elaldı ^*
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2018

Submission Date

October 8, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 25, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 7 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.468442

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA65DZ53XH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Elaldı, Ş. (2018). Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 7(4), 551-570. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.468442

Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course

Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı Dersi Kapsamında Materyal Geliştirme ve Sunum Sürecinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARI İÇİN YENİ BİR DERS: ÖĞRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ

Evaluation of Instructional Technologies Course from the Perspective of Pre-service Teachers

Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Materyal Tasarımı Deneyimlerine Yönelik Bir Durum Çalışması

© Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Education