Research Article

The Relationship between Preservice Teachers’ Educational Philosophy Preferences and Their Group Work Skills

Volume: 14 Number: 4 December 22, 2025
TR EN

The Relationship between Preservice Teachers’ Educational Philosophy Preferences and Their Group Work Skills

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between preservice teachers’ educational philosophy preferences and their group work skills, employing a correlational survey design. The population consists of 2,617 preservice teachers enrolled in the Faculty of Education at a state university during the Spring Semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. A random sample of 557 preservice teachers was selected for analysis. Data were collected using the "Philosophy Preference Assessment Scale," the "Group Work Skills Questionnaire," and an open-ended questionnaire to gather qualitative insights. The quantitative data from the scales were analysed using the Jamovi package program, calculating percentages, frequencies, arithmetic means, and standard deviations to assess participants' personal characteristics and levels of educational philosophy and group work skills. Qualitative data from the open-ended questionnaire were analysed using descriptive statistics, categorizing responses and determining their frequencies. This study found that preservice teachers predominantly adopt contemporary educational philosophies while exhibiting strong group work skills. As academic levels increase, there is a positive correlation between contemporary philosophy preferences and group work skills, with those in primary and language education showing the highest levels. Increased participation in group work enhances both philosophical beliefs and collaborative abilities, highlighting the importance of experiential learning in teacher training.

Keywords

References

  1. Akdağ, M. (2021). Bilimsel araştırmalarda istatistiksel analiz SPSS uygulamaları[Statistical analysis in scientific research SPSS applications]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları
  2. Alanoglu, M., Aslan, S., & Karabatak, S. (2022). Do teachers’ educational philosophies affect their digital literacy? The mediating effect of resistance to change. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3447-3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10753-3
  3. Allen, K. C. (2012). Connecting research to teaching: Keys to successful group work: Culture, structure, nurture. The Mathematics Teacher, 106(4), 308-312. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.106.4.0308
  4. Altman, D. G. &, Bland J. M. (1995). Statistics notes: the normal distribution, BMJ 310, 298.
  5. Aslan, Ö. M. (2014). The effect of educational philosophy course in the view of preservice preschool teacher's philosophy preference and critical pedagogy. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 13(48), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.73598
  6. Aslan S., & Aybek, B. (2017). An investigation of educational philosophies adopted and critical thinking disposition in terms of various variables. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.281737
  7. Aytaç, A. (2020). The effect of pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs and educational philosophy tendency on teaching and learning conceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
  8. Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Group Work in Primary Schools: Effects on Science Attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663–680. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032779

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Curriculum Development in Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 22, 2025

Submission Date

May 8, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 14, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 4

APA
Kinay, İ., Süer Baytak, S., & Ardıç, T. (2025). The Relationship between Preservice Teachers’ Educational Philosophy Preferences and Their Group Work Skills. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 14(4), 997-1017. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1694739

14550                 

© Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Education