Araştırma Makalesi
Exploration of the Factors Influential on the Scientific Literacy Achievement of Turkish Students in PISA
Öz
The purpose of this
study is to make a systematic examination of the results of those studies that
have explored the variables associated with the scientific literacy achievement
of Turkish students in PISA 2003, 2006 and 2009 (Programme for International
Student Assessment) and to
determine whether such studies have obtained any generalizable and consistent
results in regard to the relationships between these variables and achievement.
Document analysis, which is a qualitative research method, was used in this
study. The research sample consisted of 23 national studies in this field. It
was observed that these studies determined a positive relationship between
parental educational level and student achievement in scientific literacy.
Likewise, it was reported that there was a positive relationship between
attitude towards science and student achievement and that female students are
more successful in scientific literacy. Moreover, the examined studies showed
that there was a positive relationship between devoted time for learning and scientific
literacy.success.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Acar, T. & Ogretmen, T. (2012). Analysis of 2006 PISA science performance via multilevel statistical methods. Education and Science. 37(163), 178-189.
- Albayrak, A. (2009). According to the PISA 2006 results, some factors that affect the success of science of Turkish students. Master thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Anagun, S. S. (2011). The impact of teaching-learning process variables to the students’ scientific literacy levels based on PISA 2006 results. Education and Science, 36(162), 84-102.
- Anil, D. (2009). Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) in Turkey. Education and Science, 34 (152), 87-100.
- Anil, D. & Ozer, Y. (2012). The effect of the aim and frequency of computer usage on student achievement according to PISA 2006. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5484-5488.
- Basusta, N. B. (2013). Differential item functioning analysis of PISA 2006 science achievement test in terms of culture and language. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara
- Boztunc, N. (2010). An investigating about mathematics and science achivement of Turkish students parcipating in programe for international student assessment (PISA) in 2003 and 2006. Unpublished Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Ceylan, E. (2009). Differences between low- and high-performing schools in scientific literacy based on PISA 2006 results in Turkey. Yüzüncü Yil University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(2), 55-75.
- Calıskan, M. (2008). The impact of school and student related factors on scientific literacy skills in the programme for international student assessment – PISA 2006. PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Celebi, Ö. (2010). A cross-cultural comparıson of the effect of human and physical resources on students’ scientific literacy skills in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006. PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Dincer, M. & Kolasin, G. (2009). Determinants of disparities in student achievement in Turkey. Education Reform Initiative, Istanbul.
- Drent, M., Meelissen, M. & Van Der Kleij, F.M. (2010). TIMSS contribution to theories of educational effectiveness: a Systematic review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 4th IEA International Research Conference, July, 1-3, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Erbas, K. C. (2005). Factors affecting scientific literacy of students in Turkey in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Fuchs, T. & Woesmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availablility and use of computers at homeand at school. http://www.res.org.uk/econometrics/504.pdf.
- Fuchs, T. & WöBmann, L. (2006). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Emprical Economics, 210-240.
- Geske, A., Grinfelds, A., Dedze, I. & Zhang, Y. 2006. Family background, school quality and rural-urban disparities in student learning achievement in Latvia. Prospects, 419-431.
- Gumus, S. & Atalmiş, E. H. (2012). Achievement gaps between different school types and regions in Turkey: Have they changed over time?. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 2(2), 50-66.
- Karabay, E. (2012). Examination of the predictive powers of socio- cultural variables for pisa science literacy by years. Master Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.
- Kahle, J. B., Meece, J. & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019-104.
- Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2005). PISA 2003 project. National final report, Ankara.
- Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2010). PISA 2009 project. National pre-report, Ankara.
- OECD (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manual. Paris: Author.
- OECD (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: Author.
- OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
- Ozer, Y. (2009). According to 2006 programme for international student assessment (PISA) factors affecting success of scentific and mathematical literacy of students in Turkey. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Ozer, Y. & Anil, D. (2011). Examining the factors affecting students’ science snd mathematics achievement with structrural equation modeling. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 313-324.
- Ozel, M., Caglak, S. & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73-82.
- Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & Von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142-151.
- Sarier, Y. (2010). An evaluation of equal opportunities in education in the light of high school entrance exams (OKS-SBS) and PISA results. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, 11(3), 107-129.
- Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundemental school knowledge 15-year-old should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 349-375.
- Şaşmazel, A. G. (2006). Factors that affecting success of scientific literacy on students in Turkey that participate programme for international student assessment (PISA). Master Thesis, Hacettepe Universiy, Ankara.
- Tomul, E. & Celik, K. (2006). The relationship between the students’ academic achievement and their socioeconomic level: Cross regional comparison. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1199–1204.
- Woessmann, L. (2004). How equal are educational opportunities? Family background and student achievement in Europe and USA. CESifo Working Paper, 1162.
- Yalcin, M., Aslan, S. & Usta, E. (2012). Analysis of PISA 2009 exam according to some variables. Mevlana Intenational Journal of Education (MIJE), 2(1), 64-71.
- Yildirim, K. (2012). According to PISA 2006 data, basic factors that determine the quality of education in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 10(2), 229-255.
Yıl 2017,
Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 320 - 339, 30.06.2017
Öz
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin
PISA 2003, 2006 ve 2009 (Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı) fen
okuryazarlığı başarısı ile ilişkili olan değişkenleri araştırıldığı çalışma
sonuçlarının sistematik bir şekilde incelenerek, bu değişkenler ve başarı
arasındaki ilişkiler hakkında, eğer varsa, genelleme yapılmasına uygun, tutarlı
sonuçların belirlenmesidir. Araştırmada nitel olarak yürütülmüş ve doküman
analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi bu alanda yapılan 23 ulusal
çalışma oluşturmuştur. Araştırmacıların,
anne-baba eğitim düzeyi değişkeni ile öğrencilerin fen okuryazarlığı başarısı
arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu tespit ettikleri gözlemlenmiştir. Benzer
şekilde araştırmalarda, öğrenci karakteristiklerinden olan fene yönelik tutum
ile öğrencilerin başarısı arasında pozitif ilişki olduğu ve kız öğrencilerin
fen okuryazarlığı alanında erkeklerden daha başarılı oldukları rapor
edilmiştir. İncelenen çalışma sonuçları öğrenmeye ayrılan zaman ile fen
okuryazarlığı başarısı arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Acar, T. & Ogretmen, T. (2012). Analysis of 2006 PISA science performance via multilevel statistical methods. Education and Science. 37(163), 178-189.
- Albayrak, A. (2009). According to the PISA 2006 results, some factors that affect the success of science of Turkish students. Master thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Anagun, S. S. (2011). The impact of teaching-learning process variables to the students’ scientific literacy levels based on PISA 2006 results. Education and Science, 36(162), 84-102.
- Anil, D. (2009). Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) in Turkey. Education and Science, 34 (152), 87-100.
- Anil, D. & Ozer, Y. (2012). The effect of the aim and frequency of computer usage on student achievement according to PISA 2006. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5484-5488.
- Basusta, N. B. (2013). Differential item functioning analysis of PISA 2006 science achievement test in terms of culture and language. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara
- Boztunc, N. (2010). An investigating about mathematics and science achivement of Turkish students parcipating in programe for international student assessment (PISA) in 2003 and 2006. Unpublished Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Ceylan, E. (2009). Differences between low- and high-performing schools in scientific literacy based on PISA 2006 results in Turkey. Yüzüncü Yil University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(2), 55-75.
- Calıskan, M. (2008). The impact of school and student related factors on scientific literacy skills in the programme for international student assessment – PISA 2006. PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Celebi, Ö. (2010). A cross-cultural comparıson of the effect of human and physical resources on students’ scientific literacy skills in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006. PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Dincer, M. & Kolasin, G. (2009). Determinants of disparities in student achievement in Turkey. Education Reform Initiative, Istanbul.
- Drent, M., Meelissen, M. & Van Der Kleij, F.M. (2010). TIMSS contribution to theories of educational effectiveness: a Systematic review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 4th IEA International Research Conference, July, 1-3, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Erbas, K. C. (2005). Factors affecting scientific literacy of students in Turkey in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Fuchs, T. & Woesmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availablility and use of computers at homeand at school. http://www.res.org.uk/econometrics/504.pdf.
- Fuchs, T. & WöBmann, L. (2006). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Emprical Economics, 210-240.
- Geske, A., Grinfelds, A., Dedze, I. & Zhang, Y. 2006. Family background, school quality and rural-urban disparities in student learning achievement in Latvia. Prospects, 419-431.
- Gumus, S. & Atalmiş, E. H. (2012). Achievement gaps between different school types and regions in Turkey: Have they changed over time?. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 2(2), 50-66.
- Karabay, E. (2012). Examination of the predictive powers of socio- cultural variables for pisa science literacy by years. Master Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.
- Kahle, J. B., Meece, J. & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019-104.
- Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2005). PISA 2003 project. National final report, Ankara.
- Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2010). PISA 2009 project. National pre-report, Ankara.
- OECD (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manual. Paris: Author.
- OECD (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: Author.
- OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
- Ozer, Y. (2009). According to 2006 programme for international student assessment (PISA) factors affecting success of scentific and mathematical literacy of students in Turkey. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
- Ozer, Y. & Anil, D. (2011). Examining the factors affecting students’ science snd mathematics achievement with structrural equation modeling. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 313-324.
- Ozel, M., Caglak, S. & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73-82.
- Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & Von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142-151.
- Sarier, Y. (2010). An evaluation of equal opportunities in education in the light of high school entrance exams (OKS-SBS) and PISA results. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, 11(3), 107-129.
- Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundemental school knowledge 15-year-old should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 349-375.
- Şaşmazel, A. G. (2006). Factors that affecting success of scientific literacy on students in Turkey that participate programme for international student assessment (PISA). Master Thesis, Hacettepe Universiy, Ankara.
- Tomul, E. & Celik, K. (2006). The relationship between the students’ academic achievement and their socioeconomic level: Cross regional comparison. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1199–1204.
- Woessmann, L. (2004). How equal are educational opportunities? Family background and student achievement in Europe and USA. CESifo Working Paper, 1162.
- Yalcin, M., Aslan, S. & Usta, E. (2012). Analysis of PISA 2009 exam according to some variables. Mevlana Intenational Journal of Education (MIJE), 2(1), 64-71.
- Yildirim, K. (2012). According to PISA 2006 data, basic factors that determine the quality of education in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 10(2), 229-255.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2017 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 27 Ocak 2016 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 |
