Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri (BİT) Kapsamında Dijital Hikaye Anlatımı (DHA) Üzerine Araştırma: Sistematik Bir İnceleme (Ocak 2018 - Haziran 2023)

Year 2023, Volume: 52 Issue: 1 - K-12 BECERİ EĞİTİMİNDE TÜRKİYE PERSPEKTİFİ: KURAM VE UYGULAMA, 941 - 970, 25.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309013

Abstract

DHA (Dijital Hikaye Anlatımı) son yıllarda birçok farklı konuda kullanılmıştır. DHA, çeşitlilik iletişimi yoluyla eğitim ortamları oluşturarak daha demokratik ve eşit bir eğitim vaat etmektedir. Bu araştırma, eğitim araştırması ve pratiğinde BİT'yi (Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri) entegre etme yöntemlerinden biri olan dijital hikaye anlatıcılığının eğitimsel kullanımını sistemli bir şekilde incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışma, özellikle, eğitim zorluklarına çözüm sağlama noktasında BİT entegrasyonunun süregelen zorluklarını ve DHA'nın bu BİT zorluklarının çözümüne ne ölçüde katkı sağlayabileceğini keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, BİT Eğitimi (36 çalışma) ve Dijital Hikaye Anlatımı (27 çalışma) üzerine 63 çalışmanın sistemli incelemelerini sunmaktadır. Çalışmanın bir parçası olarak, belirlenen kriterlere dayanarak Ocak 2018 - Mayıs 2022 tarihleri arasında arama yapmak üzere WoS ve SCOPUS veri tabanları dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen verilerin analizinde, hem betimleyici analiz hem de indüktif analizin sonucu olarak elde edilen betimleyici temalar kullanılarak analitik temalar kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda elde edilen veriler, yıllara göre dağılım, araştırmanın gerçekleştirildiği ülkeler, araştırmanın eğitim alanı seviyesi, konular, örnek/çalışma grubu, araştırma yöntemleri ve araştırmanın sonuçları gibi kategorilere ayrılmıştır. Bu sonuçlar, dijital hikaye anlatıcılığının ve BİT entegrasyonunun eğitim uygulamalarında ve araştırmalarında etkin bir şekilde nasıl kullanılacağına dair önemli bilgiler sağlamaktadır. Bu bilgiler, gelecekteki uygulamalar ve araştırmalar için değerli bir kaynak oluşturabilir ve eğitimde BİT ve DHA kullanımının daha da genişlemesini teşvik edebilir.

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK 3005

Project Number

121G202

Thanks

Tubitak 3005 programı kapsamında üretilen çalışmamız için verilen desteğe teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Alquraini, T., and Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42-59.
  • Austen, L., Pickering, N., and Judge, M. (2020). Student reflections on the pedagogy of transitions into higher education, through digital storytelling. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-12.
  • Barrett, H. (2006). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. C. Crawford (Ed.), In Proceedings of society for ınformation technology and teacher education ınternational conference (pp. 647-654). Chesapeake, VA: AACH.
  • Bauer, A. M., and Kroeger, S. (2004). Inclusive classrooms: Video cases on CD-Rom activity and learning guide (Vol. 1). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
  • Çalık, M., and Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education & Science, 39(174), 33-38.
  • Çıralı, H., and Koçak-Usluel, Y. (2015). A descriptive review study about digital storytelling in educational context. In 7th ınternational conference on education and new learning technologies (EDULEARN15). Barcelona, Spain.
  • De Jager, A., Fogarty, A., Tewson, A., Lenette, C., and Boydell, K. M. (2017). Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report, 22(10), 2548-2582.
  • Erişti, B. (2010). Eğitimde dönüşümler. H. F. Odabaşı (Ed.), Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri ışığında dönüşümler içinde (s. 1-112). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Florian, L. (2015). Conceptualising pedagogy: the ınclusive pedagogical approach in action. In J. M. Deppele, T. Loreman, R. Smith, L. Florian (Eds.) Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum (pp.11-24). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., and Sharma, U. (2013). Education for students with disability: A review of the best evidence in relation to theory and practice. Braddon, ACT: Australian Research Alliance for Children & Youth.
  • Frazel, M. (2010). Digital storytelling guide for educators (1st ed.). Eugene, Or: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Gils, F. (2005). Potential applications of digital storytelling in education. In 3rd twente student conference on IT (pp.17-18). University of Twente Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Ensched.
  • Greene, S., Burke, K. J., and McKenna, M. K. (2018). A review of research connecting digital storytelling, photovoice, and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 844-878.
  • Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09578231311304670/full/html
  • Hallinger, P. (2018). Surfacing a hidden literature: A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 362-384.
  • Harris, K., Marcus R., and Mclaren K. (2001). Curriculum material* supporting problem based teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 101(6), 310-31S.
  • Ivankovic, A., Spiranec, S., and Miljko, D. (2013). Student’s level of ict literacy by study groups on faculty of philosophy, University of Mostar. In Information & Communication Technology Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013 36th International Convention on (pp. 605-609). IEEE.
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews [Unpublished pHD Thesis]. Keele University National ICT Australia Ltd, Australia.
  • Lambert J. (2007). The digital storytelling cookbook. Berkeley, CA: Center for Digital Storytelling/Digital Diner Press.
  • Loreman, T.J., Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Sharma, U., Deppelen J. M. (2014). Conceptualising and measuring education. C. Forlin and T. Ixireman (Eds.), In Measuring education (s. 3-17). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., and Scruggs, T. E. (2010). Vie classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Meadows, D. (2003). Digital storytelling: Research-based practice in new media. Visual Communication, 2(2), 189-193.
  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (2015). Nitel veri analizi (Çev. S. Akbaba Altun and A. Ersoy). Pegem Akademi.
  • Mordal, K, N., Stremstad, M. (1998). Norway: Adapted education for all? In T. Booth ve M. Ainscow (Eds.), From them to us: An international study of inclusion in education (s. 220-230). Psychology Press.
  • Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., Xiong, X. B., Lim, C. P., and Yan, H. (2018). An online Chinese-Australian language and cultural exchange through digital storytelling. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(2), 128-149.
  • Ohler, J. (2008). Digital storytelling in the classroom. new media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  • PRISMA (2020). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/PRISMAStatement
  • Park, H. R. (2019). ESOL pre-service teachers’ experiences and learning in completing a reflection paper and digital storytelling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 63-77.
  • Petty, G. (2009). Teaching today a practical guide (4th Edition). Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
  • Porter, G. L., and Smith, D. (2011). Exploring educational practices through professional inquiry. Sense Publishers.
  • Psomos, P., and Kordaki, M. (2012). Pedagogical analysis of educational digital storytelling environments of the last five years. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1213-1218.
  • Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47, 220-228.
  • Rose, D. H., and Strangman, N. (2007). Universal design for learning: Meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 381-391.
  • Rose, R. (2001). Primary school teacher perceptions of the conditions required to include pupils with special educational needs. Educational review, 53(2), 147-156.
  • Shaddock, A., Giorcelli, L., and Smith, S. (2007). Students with disability in mainstream classrooms. http://www.ndco.stepscs.net.au/pdf/Strategies%20for%20teachers%20in%20mainstream%20classrooms%20booklet.pdf.
  • Sitlington, P. L., Clark, G. M., and Kolstoe, O. P. (2000). Transition education and services for adolescents with disabilities. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Smith, P., and Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Smith, T. E. C., Polioway, E., Patton, J. R., and Dowdy, C. A. (2014). Teaching students with special needs in settings (4th Edition). Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Spence- Cochran, K., Pearl, C. E., and Walker, Z. (2013). Full inclusion into schools: Strategies for collaborative instruction. P. Wehman (Ed.), In Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 175-195). 4th. Edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Svoen, B., Dobson, S., and Bjørge, L. T. (2019). Let's talk and share! Refugees and migrants building social inclusion and wellbeing through digital stories and online learning resources. International Journal of ICT Education, 1-14.
  • Şimşek, B., Koçak-Usluel, Y., Sarıca-Çıra, H., and Tekeli, P. (2018). Türkiye’de eğitsel bağlamda dijital hikâye anlatımı konusuna eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(1), 158-186.
  • Thomas, J., and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1-10.
  • Tummons, J. (2009). Curriculum studies in the life long learning sector. SAGE Publishing.
  • UNICEF (2013). The state of the World’s children 2013: Children with disabilities. https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_69379.html
  • Wu, J., and Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, 103786.
  • Yang, Y. T. C., Chen, Y. C., and Hung, H. T. (2020). Digital storytelling as an interdisciplinary project to improve students’ English speaking and creative thinking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23.
  • Yücesoy Özkan, Ş., Kırkgöz S., and Beşdere, B. (2019). Normalleştirmeden kapsayıcı eğitime: tarihsel gelişim. H. Gürgür and S. Rakap (Ed.) Kapsayıcı Eği̇ti̇m Özel Eği̇ti̇mde Bütünleşti̇rme içinde (1. Baskı, ss. 19-56). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Research on Digital Storytelling (DST) in the Context of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): A Systematic Review (January 2018- June 2023)

Year 2023, Volume: 52 Issue: 1 - K-12 BECERİ EĞİTİMİNDE TÜRKİYE PERSPEKTİFİ: KURAM VE UYGULAMA, 941 - 970, 25.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309013

Abstract

DST (Digital Storytelling) has been used on many variant subjects in recent years. It is promising because DST allows a more democratic and equal education through creating educational settings by communicating diversity. This research aims to systematically examine the educational use of digital storytelling which is one of the ways of integrating ICT in educational research and practice. This study particularly seeks to discover the lasting challenges of ICT integration for the solution to challenges of education as well as to what extent DST can contribute to solving these challenges of ICT for learning and inclusion. The study presents systematic reviews of 63 studies on ICT Education (36 study), Digital Storytelling (27 study). As part of the study WoS and SCOPUS databases were included for search within January 2018- May 2022 based on the defined criterias. In the analysis of the data obtained in the study, analytical themes were used by using both the descriptive analysis and descriptive themes obtained as the result of the inductive analysis. The outcome obtained as a result of the research are categories such as the distribution according to the years, the countries where the research was held, the level of the field of education of the research, the subjects, the sample/study group, the research methods, and the results of the research is given.

Project Number

121G202

References

  • Alquraini, T., and Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42-59.
  • Austen, L., Pickering, N., and Judge, M. (2020). Student reflections on the pedagogy of transitions into higher education, through digital storytelling. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-12.
  • Barrett, H. (2006). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. C. Crawford (Ed.), In Proceedings of society for ınformation technology and teacher education ınternational conference (pp. 647-654). Chesapeake, VA: AACH.
  • Bauer, A. M., and Kroeger, S. (2004). Inclusive classrooms: Video cases on CD-Rom activity and learning guide (Vol. 1). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
  • Çalık, M., and Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education & Science, 39(174), 33-38.
  • Çıralı, H., and Koçak-Usluel, Y. (2015). A descriptive review study about digital storytelling in educational context. In 7th ınternational conference on education and new learning technologies (EDULEARN15). Barcelona, Spain.
  • De Jager, A., Fogarty, A., Tewson, A., Lenette, C., and Boydell, K. M. (2017). Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report, 22(10), 2548-2582.
  • Erişti, B. (2010). Eğitimde dönüşümler. H. F. Odabaşı (Ed.), Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri ışığında dönüşümler içinde (s. 1-112). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Florian, L. (2015). Conceptualising pedagogy: the ınclusive pedagogical approach in action. In J. M. Deppele, T. Loreman, R. Smith, L. Florian (Eds.) Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum (pp.11-24). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., and Sharma, U. (2013). Education for students with disability: A review of the best evidence in relation to theory and practice. Braddon, ACT: Australian Research Alliance for Children & Youth.
  • Frazel, M. (2010). Digital storytelling guide for educators (1st ed.). Eugene, Or: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Gils, F. (2005). Potential applications of digital storytelling in education. In 3rd twente student conference on IT (pp.17-18). University of Twente Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Ensched.
  • Greene, S., Burke, K. J., and McKenna, M. K. (2018). A review of research connecting digital storytelling, photovoice, and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 844-878.
  • Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09578231311304670/full/html
  • Hallinger, P. (2018). Surfacing a hidden literature: A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 362-384.
  • Harris, K., Marcus R., and Mclaren K. (2001). Curriculum material* supporting problem based teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 101(6), 310-31S.
  • Ivankovic, A., Spiranec, S., and Miljko, D. (2013). Student’s level of ict literacy by study groups on faculty of philosophy, University of Mostar. In Information & Communication Technology Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013 36th International Convention on (pp. 605-609). IEEE.
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews [Unpublished pHD Thesis]. Keele University National ICT Australia Ltd, Australia.
  • Lambert J. (2007). The digital storytelling cookbook. Berkeley, CA: Center for Digital Storytelling/Digital Diner Press.
  • Loreman, T.J., Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Sharma, U., Deppelen J. M. (2014). Conceptualising and measuring education. C. Forlin and T. Ixireman (Eds.), In Measuring education (s. 3-17). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., and Scruggs, T. E. (2010). Vie classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Meadows, D. (2003). Digital storytelling: Research-based practice in new media. Visual Communication, 2(2), 189-193.
  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (2015). Nitel veri analizi (Çev. S. Akbaba Altun and A. Ersoy). Pegem Akademi.
  • Mordal, K, N., Stremstad, M. (1998). Norway: Adapted education for all? In T. Booth ve M. Ainscow (Eds.), From them to us: An international study of inclusion in education (s. 220-230). Psychology Press.
  • Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., Xiong, X. B., Lim, C. P., and Yan, H. (2018). An online Chinese-Australian language and cultural exchange through digital storytelling. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(2), 128-149.
  • Ohler, J. (2008). Digital storytelling in the classroom. new media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  • PRISMA (2020). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/PRISMAStatement
  • Park, H. R. (2019). ESOL pre-service teachers’ experiences and learning in completing a reflection paper and digital storytelling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 63-77.
  • Petty, G. (2009). Teaching today a practical guide (4th Edition). Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
  • Porter, G. L., and Smith, D. (2011). Exploring educational practices through professional inquiry. Sense Publishers.
  • Psomos, P., and Kordaki, M. (2012). Pedagogical analysis of educational digital storytelling environments of the last five years. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1213-1218.
  • Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47, 220-228.
  • Rose, D. H., and Strangman, N. (2007). Universal design for learning: Meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 381-391.
  • Rose, R. (2001). Primary school teacher perceptions of the conditions required to include pupils with special educational needs. Educational review, 53(2), 147-156.
  • Shaddock, A., Giorcelli, L., and Smith, S. (2007). Students with disability in mainstream classrooms. http://www.ndco.stepscs.net.au/pdf/Strategies%20for%20teachers%20in%20mainstream%20classrooms%20booklet.pdf.
  • Sitlington, P. L., Clark, G. M., and Kolstoe, O. P. (2000). Transition education and services for adolescents with disabilities. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Smith, P., and Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Smith, T. E. C., Polioway, E., Patton, J. R., and Dowdy, C. A. (2014). Teaching students with special needs in settings (4th Edition). Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Spence- Cochran, K., Pearl, C. E., and Walker, Z. (2013). Full inclusion into schools: Strategies for collaborative instruction. P. Wehman (Ed.), In Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 175-195). 4th. Edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Svoen, B., Dobson, S., and Bjørge, L. T. (2019). Let's talk and share! Refugees and migrants building social inclusion and wellbeing through digital stories and online learning resources. International Journal of ICT Education, 1-14.
  • Şimşek, B., Koçak-Usluel, Y., Sarıca-Çıra, H., and Tekeli, P. (2018). Türkiye’de eğitsel bağlamda dijital hikâye anlatımı konusuna eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(1), 158-186.
  • Thomas, J., and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1-10.
  • Tummons, J. (2009). Curriculum studies in the life long learning sector. SAGE Publishing.
  • UNICEF (2013). The state of the World’s children 2013: Children with disabilities. https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_69379.html
  • Wu, J., and Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, 103786.
  • Yang, Y. T. C., Chen, Y. C., and Hung, H. T. (2020). Digital storytelling as an interdisciplinary project to improve students’ English speaking and creative thinking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23.
  • Yücesoy Özkan, Ş., Kırkgöz S., and Beşdere, B. (2019). Normalleştirmeden kapsayıcı eğitime: tarihsel gelişim. H. Gürgür and S. Rakap (Ed.) Kapsayıcı Eği̇ti̇m Özel Eği̇ti̇mde Bütünleşti̇rme içinde (1. Baskı, ss. 19-56). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Derleme Makalesi
Authors

Zümrüt Varol Selçuk 0000-0001-5015-0291

Gamze Mercan 0000-0001-5515-999X

Pınar Köseoğlu 0000-0002-6222-7978

Project Number 121G202
Publication Date December 25, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 52 Issue: 1 - K-12 BECERİ EĞİTİMİNDE TÜRKİYE PERSPEKTİFİ: KURAM VE UYGULAMA

Cite

APA Varol Selçuk, Z., Mercan, G., & Köseoğlu, P. (2023). Research on Digital Storytelling (DST) in the Context of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): A Systematic Review (January 2018- June 2023). Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(1), 941-970. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309013